DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Application for the Correction of
the Coast Guard Record of:
BCMR Docket No. 2006-047
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FINAL DECISION
AUTHOR: Ulmer, D.
This proceeding was conducted according to the provisions of section 1552 of
title 10 and section 425 of title 14 of the United States Code. The Chair docketed the
case on January 30, 2006, upon receipt of the applicant’s completed application and
military records.
duly appointed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case.
This final decision, dated November 2, 2006, is adopted and signed by the three
APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS
The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he was
entitled to full basic allowance for housing (BAH) 1, rather than BAH-II, 2 for the period
of active duty from September 6, 2005, through October 19, 2005. The applicant stated
that, after making several appeals, he was told on January 3, 2006, that he was not
entitled to BAH.
1 BAH is a monthly housing allowance for members on active duty. It varies according to the grade in
which serving or appointed for basic pay purposes, dependency status, and the permanent duty station
(PDS) assigned. Chapter 3.C.1. of the Pay Manual. It consists of the former allowance known as Basic
allowance for quarters (BAQ) and variable housing allowance (VHA). Chapter 3.C.2.a. of the Pay Manual.
2 BAH-II is the equivalent to what used to be basic allowance for quarters (BAQ). It does not vary by
geographic location. It is the housing allowance, or is used to calculate the housing allowance for
members in particular circumstances, such as reservists on active duty for less than 20 weeks . . .
members with court-ordered child support, and members in confinement, etc. Chapter 3.C.2.b. of the
Pay Manual.
The applicant, a Reservist, served on active duty for special work (ADSW) orders
during the Hurricane Katrina relief effort from September 6, 2005, through October 19,
2005. He received BAH-II for this active duty period, but believes that he was entitled
to full BAH based upon his interpretation of Chapter 12.F.1. of COMDTINST
M7220.29A (Coast Guard Pay Manual), hereafter referred to as the Pay Manual. This
provision states as follows:
a. . . . Except as provided in subparagraph b. below, a reserve component
member called or ordered to active duty for 139 days or less is entitled to
BAH-II. However, if the member receives an order modification or
extension of assignment, the prospective period of active duty (as
measured from the date the orders are amended to the new ending date)
must total 140 days or more and BAH would start on the date of
modification. Members whose orders originally called or ordered the
member to active duty for 140 days or more are entitled to BAH.
b. Contingency Operations. A reserve component member called or
ordered to active duty in support of a contingency operation (other than a
member who is authorized transportation of household goods as a part of
the call or order) is entitled to BAH, if the member is unable to continue to
occupy the primary residence because of the call or order to active duty.
This applies when the residence is maintained as the primary residence of
the member when called or ordered to active duty and is owned by the
member or for which the member is responsible for rental payments.
A contingency operation is defined as a military operation that is designated by
the Secretary of Defense as one in which members of the armed force are or may
become involved in military actions, operations, or hostilities against an enemy of the
United States or against an opposing military force. A contingency operation is also
defined as a military operation that results in a call or order to active duty under 10
U.S.C. §§ 672(a), 673, 673b, 673c, 688, 3500, or 8500,3 or any other provision of law
during a war or national emergency declared by the President or Congress. See figure
3-8, Note 3. of the Coast Guard Pay Manual.
The applicant argued that he was entitled to BAH because both the President and
the Secretary of Defense declared a national emergency with respect to Hurricane
Katrina.
In this regard, he submitted a Presidential Proclamation entitled:
"Proclamation by the President: To suspend Subchapter IV of Chapter 31 of Title 40,
United States Code, Within a limited Geographical Area in Response to the National
3 These sections of the title 10 have been renumbered, except that sections 3500 and 8500 have been
abolished and section 688 remains unchanged. The renumbered sections are 10 USC §§ 12301, 12302,
12304, & 12305.
Emergency Caused by Hurricane Katrina." The proclamation specifically stated,
"Hurricane Katrina constitutes a 'national emergency' within the meaning of section
3147 of title 40, United Stated Code."4
The applicant also submitted a memorandum from the Under Secretary of
Defense entitled: "Increased Thresholds for Procurements in Support of Hurricane
Katrina Relief Efforts". The Under Secretary authorized the use of the special
procurement authorities in 41 U.S.C. 428a to increase the micro-purchase, the simplified
acquisition, and the rest program for commercial item thresholds for procurements in
support of Hurricane Katrina efforts.
The applicant further argued that in addition to having established the existence
of a declared national emergency with respect to Hurricane Katrina, he also met the
other eligibility requirement for entitlement to full BAH. In this regard, he stated that
he was not authorized transportation of household goods, that he could not remain in
his California home, and that he paid rent for the entire period that he was a responder
in Louisiana.
VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On June 26, 2006, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard
submitted an advisory opinion recommending that the Board deny the applicant’s
request. The JAG stated that the applicant had not met his burden of production and
persuasion in overcoming the presumption of regularity afforded Coast Guard officials.
The JAG stated that the applicant's call to active duty was in response to a voluntary
solicitation for reservists.
The JAG stated that for the applicant to be entitled to BAH he had to meet the
requirements of the Pay Manual, which allowed the payment of BAH to a reservist who
is ordered to active duty for less than 140 days, if the member's orders to active duty
were in support of a national contingency. In this regard, the JAG stated the following:
The Applicant has not provided nor has the Coast Guard been able to find
evidence that the Secretary of Defense designated a contingency operation
for purposes of BAH or that reservists were involuntarily recalled
pursuant to one of the triggering authorities . . . The applicant is incorrect
4 Further in the Presidential Proclamation, it reads "[The] President of the United States of America, do
by this proclamation suspend as to all contracts entered into on or after the date of the proclamation and
until otherwise provided, the provisions of subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United State Code, 40
U.S.C. 3141-3148, and the provisions of all other acts providing for the payment of wages, which
provisions are dependent upon determinations by the Secretary of Labor under section 3142 of title 40,
United States Code, as they apply to contracts to be performed in the following jurisdictions: [Counties
affected in Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana]."
in asserting that a declaration of contingency for the purpose of procuring
goods and services in support of hurricane relief triggers the BAH
entitlement under the Coast Guard Pay Manual . . . Therefore, there is no
entitlement to payment of full BAH for the period of service in question.
If this operation is subsequently declared a contingency by the Secretary
of Defense for purposes of BAH, the Coast Guard will be authorized to
pay the BAH rate and other applicable entitlements effected under the
contingency order.
APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On August 15, 2006, the Board received the applicant's reply to the views of the
Coast Guard. He disagreed with the advisory opinion and argued that he has
established that the President declared a national emergency under which he served on
active duty, and therefore, he is entitled to full BAH. In this regard, he offered the
President's message notifying Congress "of his declaration of a national emergency
within the limited geographic area of the states of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and
Mississippi in response to Hurricane Katrina, pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 1621(a)." 5
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the
applicant's military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submissions, and
applicable law:
1. The Board has jurisdiction concerning this matter pursuant to section 1552 of
title 10 of the United States Code. The application was timely.
2. The applicant volunteered for active duty in response to a solicitation from
the Commandant for personnel to serve on active duty in support of Hurricane Katrina
relief efforts. Subsequently, he was issued orders to and served on active duty from
September 6, 2005, through October 19, 2005, for which he received pay and allowances
that included BAH-II. He is requesting that the Board finds that he was entitled to BAH
for this period of active duty because it was in support of a contingency operation,
which was the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
3. Since the applicant's orders to active duty were for a period less than 140 days,
he would only be entitled to BAH if he were called or ordered to active duty in support
of a contingency operation and was unable to continue to occupy his primary residence.
See Chapter 12.F.1. of the Coast Guard Pay Manual.
5 Section 1621 of title 50 of the United States Code gives the President to power to declare national
emergencies.
4. Figure 3-8, Note 3 of the Coast Guard Pay Manual defines a contingency
operation as a military operation that is
a. [d]esignated by the Secretary of Defense as an operation in which
members of the armed forces are or may become involved in military
actions, operations, or hostilities against an enemy of the United States or
against an opposing military force; or
b. that results in the call or order to, or retention on, active duty of
members of the Uniformed Services under 10 USC [§§ 12301, 12302, 12304,
12305 & 688]6, or any other provision of law during a war or during a
national emergency declared by the President or Congress.
5. The applicant has failed to prove that he was called to active duty in support
of a contingency operation designated by the Secretary of Defense. There is no evidence
in the record that the Secretary of Defense designated Hurricane Katrina relief efforts as
a contingency operation that involved military actions, operations, or hostilities against
an enemy of the United States. The Under Secretary of Defense did authorize
"Increased Thresholds for Procurements in Support of Hurricane Katrina Relief Efforts"
under the special emergency procurement authorities in 41 U.S.C. § 428a. However,
the purpose of recognizing Hurricane Katrina as an emergency was to have the
authority necessary to relax the federal rules with respect to procurements. As such, the
recognition by the Under Secretary does not satisfy the definition of a contingency
operation, as defined in Figure 3-8, Note 3., paragraph a. of the Pay Manual, because it
did not designate a contingency operation against an enemy of the United States.
6. Nor has the applicant proved that the President or Congress declared a
national emergency that resulted in a call or order to active duty of the uniformed
services under any provision of law. While the President's proclamation "To Suspend
Subchapter IV of Chapter 31 of Title 40, United States Code, Within in a Limited
Geographic Area in Response to the National Emergency caused by Hurricane Katrina"
is proof that he declared a national emergency, it did not contain the essential element
of involuntarily ordering or calling to, or retaining uniformed personnel on active duty.
In this regard, the Presidential Proclamation stated that "[the President] finds that the
conditions caused by Hurricane Katrina constitute a 'national emergency' within the
meaning of section 3147 of title 40, United States Code," which gave the President the
6 These statutes allow for the involuntary recall of Reservists in the event of a national emergency,
except that 10 U.S.C. § 1205 allows for the suspension of certain laws relating to promotion, retirement,
and separation of any member in the armed forces if the President determines it is essential to the
National Security of the United States.
authority to suspend the provisions of 40 USC §§ 3141 et. seq. (that required wage rate
requirements in federal contracts).
7. Therefore, the proclamation by the President was for the limited purpose of
making the contracting process easier and faster for getting aid to the people and for
rebuilding the affected Gulf Coast areas. Paragraph b. of Figure 3-8, Note 3. of the Pay
Manual states in relevant part that a contingency operation is a military operation that
results in the call or order to, or retention on, active duty of members of the Uniformed Services
under 10 USC [§§ 1209, 12302, 12304, 12305 & 688], or any other provision of law during a
national emergency declared by the President or Congress.
The President's
Proclamation dealing with the suspension of the wage rate requirements because of the
national emergency caused by Hurricane Katrina mentioned nothing about calling or
ordering members of the uniformed service to active duty in support of the relief
effort.7
8. Accordingly, the applicant has failed to prove that the Coast Guard
committed an error or injustice by not paying him BAH for the period he served on
active duty in support of Hurricane Katrina Relief efforts.
7 Compare the Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Terrorist Attacks of September 14, 2001.
In this Declaration, the President made it clear that he intended to utilize 10 USC § § 12006 & 12302 and
14 USC 331, 359, & 367, all of which allows for recalling reservists or retirees to active duty or detaining
those already on active duty.
ORDER
The application of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCGR, for correction of his
military record is denied.
Harold C. Davis, M.D.
James E. McLeod
Dorothy J. Ulmer
CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2011-017
He contended that a person who is involuntarily recalled to active duty is entitled to a DD 214 upon his or her release from that period of active duty. He stated that it is in the interest of justice to consider his application if more than 3 years have passed since he discovered the error because “[a]s a service member, I performed my duties as required in accordance with the UCMJ and the oath I had taken upon enlistment into the armed forces.” He also stated that during “the hurricane...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2009-244
PSC recommended that the applicant’s request be granted because the applicant was recalled in support of a national contingency and that his DD 214 for this active duty period does not account for the applicant’s recall to active duty under Title 10 of the United States Code. PSC recommended that relief be granted by correcting the applicant’s record through the APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On February 19, 2010, the Board received the applicant’s response to the...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-096
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The applicant stated that the Coast Guard denied his 2008 request to have the 18 days of leave restored, even though he qualified for SLA. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On August 12, 2008, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted a memorandum in which he adopted the comments provided by Commander, Coast Guard Personnel Command...
CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2008-096
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The applicant stated that the Coast Guard denied his 2008 request to have the 18 days of leave restored, even though he qualified for SLA. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On August 12, 2008, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted a memorandum in which he adopted the comments provided by Commander, Coast Guard Personnel Command...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04222
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04222 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be eligible for Reserve retired pay on 10 Nov 10, nine months prior to his 60th birthday on 10 Aug 11. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was only six days short of performing the required...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2006-130
[The applicant] further claims that the Commandant of the United States Coast Guard improperly removed him from the rolls of the Coast Guard Reserve. of the Coast Guard Pay Manual and section 501 of title 37 of the United States Code, a member may receive payment for unused accrued leave up to a career maximum of 60 days, which the applicant had already met at the time of his release from active duty in December 2001. The JAG summarized the Coast Guard's recommendations, as follows: A) the...
CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2006-030
In Godwin, the Coast Guard determined that ten of the twelve eligible RPA officers on active duty were not available to serve as members of the Py94 (promotion year 1994) RPA Selection Board for the following reasons: Three officers served on the previous year's board; one officer was being considered for continuation by the same selection board; one officer's record was inadequate; two officers were too junior and classmates of the candidate being considered by the board; two officers had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005565
The applicant requests correction of item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the following language "The period of service under these orders is exempt from the 5-year limit as provided in Title 38, U.S. Code, section 4312." A DD Form 214 will be issued at the time the applicant completes his period of active duty. Additionally, his DD Form 214, dated 24 June 2007, for this period of active duty correctly shows the three required...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2012-001
PSC stated that through the NOE, the applicant was authorized medical care and treat- ment from her RELAD date through May 31, 2011, and was eligible for incapacitation pay for the same period, although she only requested incapacitation pay for the first 90 days. § 12301(h) states that a member may be voluntarily ordered to active duty or retained on active duty to receive authorized medical care. Under Chapter 6.B.3.a., a “Notice of Eligibility (NOE) for authorized medical treatment is...
CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2012-036
A Reserve officer to whom this section applies is not considered to have failed of selection when eliminated from a list of selectees for promotion solely as a result of being removed from an active status.” 14 USC § 734(a) states: “A Reserve officer shall not be promoted to a higher grade unless the officer has been found to be physical qualified and the character of the officer’s service subsequent to the convening of the selection board which recommended the officer for promotion has been...